WordPress database error: [Unknown column 'fragment_anchor' in 'SELECT']SELECT id, target_post_id, anchor_text, paragraph_index, fragment_anchor
FROM wpv6_sei_insertions WHERE source_post_id = 4376 AND status = 'active'
Looking for the most conservative cities in Arizona? In this article, “most conservative city” does not mean a direct city-level vote total. It means an incorporated Arizona place whose county posted one of the highest Republican vote shares in the 2024 presidential election, with cities assigned to counties using U.S. Census TIGER/Line place geography. Because this is a county-level proxy, cities in the same county share the same GOP percentage.
Using that method, Mohave County leads this list at 77.6% Republican, which puts Lake Havasu City, Bullhead City, and Kingman at the top. They are followed by cities in Graham County at 73.6%, Gila County at 68.4%, and Yavapai County at 66.5% under the same county-to-city mapping approach. This makes the list transparent and repeatable, but it also comes with an important limitation: it reflects county presidential voting, not the full political complexity of each city.
Methodology
We defined “most conservative” using a transparent electoral proxy: each city’s county-level Republican vote share in the 2024 presidential election. For the election results, we used Arizona’s official 2024 general-election canvass materials.
We then mapped each incorporated Arizona place to its county using U.S. Census TIGER/Line geography. TIGER/Line place files include incorporated places and other place types, so we limited the list to incorporated places only.
To add scale and context, we included ACS 2023 population figures from the U.S. Census Bureau.
Cities were ranked by county GOP vote share in descending order. When multiple cities fell in the same county and therefore shared the same Republican percentage, we broke ties by city population in descending order.
Important limitation: this is a county-level proxy, not a direct city-level vote measure. That means cities within the same county share the same GOP percentage in this ranking, even though political variation can still exist inside the county.
| Rank | City | County | GOP % (2024 county) | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lake Havasu City | Mohave | 77.6 | 58037 |
| 2 | Bullhead City | Mohave | 77.6 | 42193 |
| 3 | Kingman | Mohave | 77.6 | 33850 |
| 4 | Safford | Graham | 73.6 | 10217 |
| 5 | Thatcher | Graham | 73.6 | 5354 |
| 6 | Payson | Gila | 68.4 | 16494 |
| 7 | Globe | Gila | 68.4 | 7230 |
| 8 | Prescott Valley | Yavapai | 66.5 | 48048 |
| 9 | Prescott | Yavapai | 66.5 | 46744 |
| 10 | Chino Valley | Yavapai | 66.5 | 13372 |
| 11 | Cottonwood | Yavapai | 66.5 | 12547 |
| 12 | Camp Verde | Yavapai | 66.5 | 12282 |
| 13 | Sedona | Yavapai | 66.5 | 9770 |
| 14 | Sierra Vista | Cochise | 61.0 | 45203 |
| 15 | Douglas | Cochise | 61.0 | 16118 |
| 16 | Benson | Cochise | 61.0 | 5331 |
| 17 | Maricopa | Pinal | 60.6 | 62986 |
| 18 | Casa Grande | Pinal | 60.6 | 57590 |
| 19 | Apache Junction | Pinal | 60.6 | 39746 |
| 20 | Florence | Pinal | 60.6 | 25961 |
| 21 | Eloy | Pinal | 60.6 | 16671 |
| 22 | Coolidge | Pinal | 60.6 | 15300 |
| 23 | Yuma | Yuma | 59.7 | 98461 |
| 24 | San Luis | Yuma | 59.7 | 35998 |
| 25 | Somerton | Yuma | 59.7 | 14383 |
Most Conservative Cities in Arizona
City Profiles
Mohave County — 77.6% Republican
Mohave County covers the far northwest corner of Arizona along the Colorado River, bordering Nevada and California. It is the most Republican county represented in this table by a clear margin. All three of its cities on this list sit within roughly 30 miles of the Nevada state line.
1. Lake Havasu City
County: Mohave | Population: 58,037 | County GOP %: 77.6%
Lake Havasu City is the largest of the three Mohave County entries and sits on the eastern shore of Lake Havasu, a reservoir formed by Parker Dam on the Colorado River. It is probably best known for the London Bridge, which was dismantled in England and rebuilt here in 1971 — an unusual landmark that gives the city a recognisable identity among Arizona’s smaller cities.
Affordability: The median home value runs around $411,500 and median gross rent is approximately $1,269/month — placing it at the pricier end of the Mohave trio, though still well below Prescott or Sedona. Median household income is roughly $66,264, with a poverty rate of about 13.9%.
Safety (county proxy): Mohave County’s CHR homicide proxy is 5.4 per 100,000 and injury death rate is 138.0 per 100,000. These are county-level figures; individual city crime data should be checked with the Mohave County Sheriff’s Office for a more precise picture.
Best fit for: Retirees and families drawn to water recreation, a Colorado River lifestyle, and one of Arizona’s most strongly conservative political environments. Housing costs are the tradeoff compared to the other Mohave cities.
2. Bullhead City
County: Mohave | Population: 42,193 | County GOP %: 77.6%
Bullhead City sits directly across the Colorado River from Laughlin, Nevada, giving it immediate access to Laughlin’s casinos and entertainment strip via a short bridge. The city has grown steadily as an affordable alternative to Las Vegas -adjacent Nevada communities, particularly for retirees and remote workers.
Affordability: With a median home value of around $196,900 and median rent of approximately $1,034/month, Bullhead City is notably more affordable than Lake Havasu City. Median household income sits at about $47,717, with a higher poverty rate of around 20.4% — the trade for lower housing costs.
Safety (county proxy): Same Mohave County CHR figures apply: homicides 5.4, injury deaths 138.0 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Budget-conscious buyers who want a strongly conservative Arizona community with the bonus of Nevada entertainment within walking distance. Income figures are lower here, which reflects the local economy’s hospitality/service orientation.
3. Kingman
County: Mohave | Population: 33,850 | County GOP %: 77.6%
Kingman is the county seat of Mohave County and sits at the junction of Interstate 40 and US-93 — a historic Route 66 waypoint roughly midway between Phoenix and Las Vegas. It has a working-town character that differentiates it from the tourism- and retirement-oriented atmosphere of Lake Havasu City.
Affordability: Median home value is approximately $242,700, with rent around $990/month — sitting between Bullhead City and Lake Havasu City. Median household income is about $60,418, with poverty at roughly 14.1%.
Safety (county proxy): Mohave County CHR: homicides 5.4, injury deaths 138.0 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Those who want Route 66 character, easy I-40 access, and a genuine small-city feel at an affordable price point. Less of a retiree resort destination than the other Mohave entries; more of a practical working community.
Graham County — 73.6% Republican
Graham County sits in southeastern Arizona’s Gila Valley, south of the White Mountains. It is a smaller, more rural county dominated by farming, ranching, and the community anchored around Eastern Arizona College in Thatcher.
4. Safford
County: Graham | Population: 10,217 | County GOP %: 73.6%
Safford is the county seat of Graham County. It’s a small agricultural community in the Gila Valley with a tight-knit character shaped by farming families and the LDS community that has long been present in this part of the state.
Affordability: Median home value is roughly $191,600 — among the more affordable on this list — with rent at about $976/month. Median household income sits at approximately $65,727 and poverty at around 13.3%: a reasonable income-to-housing ratio for buyers looking for real affordability.
Safety (county proxy): Graham County’s CHR figures are among the lower readings in this table: homicides 3.7, injury deaths 95.5 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Buyers wanting a genuinely affordable small-town Arizona community with strong conservative political lean and lower county-level safety risk indicators. Trade-off is limited urban amenities and remoteness from major metros.
5. Thatcher
County: Graham | Population: 5,354 | County GOP %: 73.6%
Thatcher is a small town that immediately borders Safford and is home to Eastern Arizona College. Its demographics reflect an educated, family-oriented community with notably stronger household income relative to its small size.
Affordability: Median home value of approximately $274,400 — higher than Safford — with rent at about $967/month. Median household income at roughly $77,455 with poverty around 12.3% makes this one of the better income-to-cost profiles in the Graham County tier.
Safety (county proxy): Same Graham County CHR figures: homicides 3.7, injury deaths 95.5 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Families who want proximity to a community college, a quieter small-town environment, and strong conservative community character without the housing premiums of Prescott or Sedona.
Gila County — 68.4% Republican
Gila County spans a wide arc of central Arizona from the Tonto National Forest south toward the Salt River Valley. The county includes the Payson area (mountainous, forested, popular with Phoenix escapees) and Globe (a historic copper-mining town). Note that Gila County has the highest injury-death proxy of any county in this table — worth factoring in when assessing the data.
6. Payson
County: Gila | Population: 16,494 | County GOP %: 68.4%
Payson sits at around 5,000 feet elevation in the Mogollon Rim country, roughly 90 miles northeast of Phoenix. It functions as a mountain retreat for Phoenix residents and has grown into a small city with a distinct outdoors-oriented identity built around hiking, fishing, and cooler summer temperatures.
Affordability: Median home value at approximately $343,200 and rent around $1,355/month put it toward the upper-middle of this list — elevated for a town of its size, driven by demand from Phoenix buyers seeking elevation and space. Median household income is about $65,175, with a notably low poverty rate of around 8.3%.
Safety (county proxy): Gila County has the highest CHR injury-death proxy in this table at 166.4 per 100,000, with a homicide proxy of 8.2. These are county-wide figures and reflect Gila County broadly; individual city data should be verified separately.
Best fit for: Remote workers, retirees, and Phoenix commuters who want mountain living, cooler summers, and a conservative small-city environment. The housing premium over other Gila County cities is real; the Gila County safety proxy warrants a closer look at local figures before committing.
7. Globe
County: Gila | Population: 7,230 | County GOP %: 68.4%
Globe is a historic copper-mining town that feels authentically old Arizona — brick storefronts, a working-class identity, and a location that’s less polished than Payson but significantly more affordable. It’s approximately 90 miles east of Phoenix via US-60.
Affordability: Median home value of approximately $214,800 with rent around $909/month — the most affordable Gila County entry by a clear margin. Median household income is about $66,545, but poverty sits higher at around 18.3%.
Safety (county proxy): Same Gila County CHR figures: homicides 8.2, injury deaths 166.4 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Buyers who want entry-level pricing in a conservative, small-town setting and are comfortable with a more rural, working-town character. The high county safety proxy is worth scrutinising with Globe-specific crime data before making a decision.
Yavapai County — 66.5% Republican
Yavapai County is the largest county in the contiguous U.S. It spans from the high-desert plateau around Prescott down into Verde Valley communities like Cottonwood and Camp Verde, and includes the tourism hub of Sedona at its southern edge. The county is strongly conservative overall but contains notable internal variation — a point the Sedona entry addresses directly.
8. Prescott Valley
County: Yavapai | Population: 48,048 | County GOP %: 66.5%
Prescott Valley is the newer, more suburban of the Prescott-area twin cities. It has grown rapidly as the more affordable alternative to historic Prescott, attracting families and retirees who want the Prescott political and lifestyle environment without the historic-district price premium.
Affordability: Median home value approximately $376,300, median rent $1,471/month — notably higher rent than Prescott despite lower home values, reflecting demand for rentals in a growth community. Median household income is about $70,793, poverty around 12.3%.
Safety (county proxy): Yavapai County CHR: homicides 3.0, injury deaths 127.3 per 100,000 — among the lower readings in this table.
Best fit for: Families and retirees who want suburban amenities, proximity to Prescott’s services, and a lower home purchase price than historic Prescott itself. The higher rent figure is worth noting for those not buying immediately.
9. Prescott
County: Yavapai | Population: 46,744 | County GOP %: 66.5%
Prescott is the county seat, the historically established city, and the one with the premium price tag to match. It has a recognisable downtown (Whiskey Row, Courthouse Plaza), a well-documented identity as a conservative retirement destination, and consistent top-10 appearances in “best places to retire” rankings.
Affordability: Median home value at approximately $528,500 — the second-highest on this entire list after Sedona. Rent, however, is lower than Prescott Valley at about $1,304/month, reflecting the city’s older, more owner-occupied housing stock. Median household income roughly $69,151, poverty around 11.6%.
Safety (county proxy): Yavapai County CHR: homicides 3.0, injury deaths 127.3 per 100,000.
Prescott vs. Prescott Valley — which is right for you? Both cities share the same county GOP score and similar population. The key difference is housing: Prescott’s median home ($528k) costs roughly $152,000 more than Prescott Valley’s ($376k). In return, Prescott offers an established historic downtown, stronger name recognition, and a slightly lower rental market. Prescott Valley has newer housing stock, easier commercial access, and a lower entry price for buyers.
Best fit for: Retirees and remote workers who want Prescott’s established identity and are prepared to pay the housing premium. Those prioritising lower purchase price should look at Prescott Valley first.
10. Chino Valley
County: Yavapai | Population: 13,372 | County GOP %: 66.5%
Chino Valley is a smaller community about 10 miles north of Prescott with a more rural, ranch-country character. It attracts buyers who want Prescott-area conservatism with a bit more land and a lower price point than the city proper.
Affordability: Median home value around $352,100, rent approximately $1,178/month, income roughly $59,733, poverty about 11.8%.
Safety (county proxy): Yavapai County CHR: homicides 3.0, injury deaths 127.3 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Buyers who want rural Yavapai County character — space, horses, the high desert — at a step below Prescott prices.
11. Cottonwood
County: Yavapai | Population: 12,547 | County GOP %: 66.5%
Cottonwood is the main commercial hub of the Verde Valley and sits about 20 miles south of Prescott Valley. It has a more service-oriented economy than Prescott and functions as the practical gateway town for Verde Valley residents and visitors heading to Sedona.
Affordability: Median home value approximately $286,000, rent around $1,080/month — more affordable than Prescott and Prescott Valley. Median household income is lower at about $47,162, with poverty at roughly 17.5%, which reflects its working-town economic profile.
Safety (county proxy): Yavapai County CHR: homicides 3.0, injury deaths 127.3 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Buyers who want Verde Valley access at genuinely lower prices. The income-poverty profile suggests a different economic character than Prescott — buyers should factor that into neighbourhood research.
12. Camp Verde
County: Yavapai | Population: 12,282 | County GOP %: 66.5%
Camp Verde sits at the confluence of the Verde River and Beaver Creek in the lower Verde Valley. It has a historic military fort (Fort Verde State Historic Park) and a more rural, agricultural character than Cottonwood.
Affordability: Median home value approximately $286,700, rent around $1,026/month, income about $58,383 — but poverty at roughly 21.7%, the highest of the Yavapai County entries and a signal worth investigating at the neighbourhood level.
Safety (county proxy): Yavapai County CHR: homicides 3.0, injury deaths 127.3 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Buyers drawn to rural Verde Valley character, outdoor access, and lower price points. The elevated poverty figure suggests economic conditions that vary by neighbourhood; due diligence on specific areas is recommended.
13. Sedona (the outlier explained)
County: Yavapai | Population: 9,770 | County GOP %: 66.5%
Why is Sedona on this list? Sedona appears because our “conservative” metric is county-level: Sedona is in Yavapai County (66.5% GOP). Sedona can have its distinctive arts, tourism, and spiritual community identity while still being located inside a county that votes strongly Republican. This is exactly where the proxy shows its limits — Sedona’s city-level voting pattern could differ significantly from the Yavapai County aggregate. If you’re looking for a community where conservative political culture is visible in daily life, Prescott or Prescott Valley are the more accurate reflections of that.
Affordability: Sedona is the clear outlier on housing: median home value approximately $708,400 — the highest on this list by far, and roughly $180,000 above second-place Prescott. Rent is about $1,421/month, median household income around $67,374, poverty around 13.7%.
Safety (county proxy): Yavapai County CHR: homicides 3.0, injury deaths 127.3 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Buyers who are drawn to Sedona specifically for its landscape, wellness, and arts culture — not as a conservative community choice. The county-proxy conservatism score does not reflect what Sedona feels like at street level.
Cochise County — 61.0% Republican
Cochise County occupies the southeastern corner of Arizona, bordering both New Mexico and Mexico. It includes Sierra Vista (dominated by Fort Huachuca), the historic border town of Douglas, and smaller Benson.
14. Sierra Vista
County: Cochise | Population: 45,203 | County GOP %: 61.0%
Sierra Vista is the largest city in Cochise County and is closely tied economically to Fort Huachuca, a major U.S. Army installation and intelligence centre. This gives the city a stable, military-community character with consistent employment and a conservative civic culture that reflects its base population.
Affordability: Median home value approximately $239,000, rent around $1,110/month, income about $69,783, poverty roughly 10.9% — a solid income-to-cost ratio, helped by stable military employment.
Safety (county proxy): Cochise County CHR: homicides 3.2, injury deaths 96.0 per 100,000 — among the lower readings in this table.
Best fit for: Military families, veterans, and those who value a structured, stable community with good household income averages and relatively affordable housing. Fort Huachuca’s presence means the population turns over on military timelines — factor that into any community assessment.
15. Douglas
County: Cochise | Population: 16,118 | County GOP %: 61.0%
Douglas is a border town directly across from Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico. Its bilingual, border-community character makes it distinctively different from the other cities on this list, and it carries the lowest median home value and the highest poverty rate in the entire table.
Affordability: Median home value approximately $138,200 — the most affordable on this list — with rent around $755/month. However, median household income is only about $39,350 and poverty sits at roughly 30.2%, the highest on the list by a significant margin.
Safety (county proxy): Cochise County CHR: homicides 3.2, injury deaths 96.0 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Buyers who specifically want a border-community environment and maximum housing affordability. The 30% poverty rate reflects structural economic conditions that buyers should research carefully before committing. This entry should not be read as a typical “conservative community relocation” option in the same way as Prescott or Sierra Vista.
16. Benson
County: Cochise | Population: 5,331 | County GOP %: 61.0%
Benson is a small I-10 corridor town about 45 miles east of Tucson. It sits near Kartchner Caverns State Park and functions primarily as a rural service community.
Affordability: Median home value approximately $145,700, rent around $759/month, income about $48,854, poverty roughly 14.2%. Entry-level pricing with moderate income.
Safety (county proxy): Cochise County CHR: homicides 3.2, injury deaths 96.0 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Buyers wanting a very small, very affordable rural community with I-10 access toward Tucson or El Paso. Limited local amenities; proximity to Tucson (45 miles) is the main practical advantage.
Pinal County — 60.6% Republican
Pinal County sits between Phoenix and Tucson and has been one of Arizona’s fastest-growing counties, driven largely by Phoenix metropolitan expansion. Maricopa (the city) in particular has experienced explosive growth and reflects a different character to the older, smaller Pinal communities.
17. Maricopa
County: Pinal | Population: 62,986 | County GOP %: 60.6%
Despite sharing a name with the much larger Maricopa County (which contains Phoenix), the city of Maricopa is a fast-growing Phoenix exurb about 35 miles south of downtown Phoenix. It has become a major destination for buyers priced out of the Phoenix metro proper, with a notably strong household income profile.
Affordability: Median home value approximately $338,600, with the highest rent on this entire list at around $1,919/month — a reflection of intense demand from Phoenix commuters. Median household income is approximately $94,208 with a low poverty rate of about 6.7% — the strongest income and poverty profile in this table.
Safety (county proxy): Pinal County has the lowest injury-death proxy in this table: homicides 5.6, injury deaths 75.7 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Phoenix commuters and families who want a conservative exurban community with strong household income demographics and modern suburban infrastructure. The rent figure is a warning sign for non-buyers — this market is priced by demand, not local wages.
18. Casa Grande
County: Pinal | Population: 57,590 | County GOP %: 60.6%
Casa Grande is a mid-size city on I-10 roughly midway between Phoenix and Tucson. It has a more established character than Maricopa (the city) and a more diverse economic base including manufacturing and logistics.
Affordability: Median home value approximately $258,200, rent about $1,315/month, income roughly $66,354, poverty about 14.1%.
Safety (county proxy): Pinal County CHR: homicides 5.6, injury deaths 75.7 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Buyers who want Pinal County’s conservative lean at a lower price than Maricopa (the city) with the practical benefit of I-10 access between two major metros.
19. Apache Junction
County: Pinal | Population: 39,746 | County GOP %: 60.6%
Apache Junction sits at the eastern edge of the Phoenix metro, at the base of the Superstition Mountains. It has a well-established retiree and snowbird population and a strong RV/mobile home community character.
Affordability: Median home value approximately $196,700, rent around $1,019/month, income roughly $58,619, poverty about 11.0%.
Safety (county proxy): Pinal County CHR: homicides 5.6, injury deaths 75.7 per 100,000.
Best fit for: Retirees, snowbirds, and buyers looking for entry-level prices at the edge of the Phoenix metro with Superstition Mountains access. The community character is older and more RV/manufactured-home oriented than other Pinal entries.
20–22. Florence, Eloy, and Coolidge
These three smaller Pinal County cities share the county’s conservative profile and safety proxy (homicides 5.6, injury deaths 75.7 per 100,000).
Florence (25,961 people) is the county seat and stands out for a strong income profile (~$76,259) and low poverty (~7.4%) relative to its size, with a median home value around $322,600 and rent ~$1,163/month.
Eloy (16,671 people) offers affordable housing (~$243,600 median, rent ~$938/month) but carries a higher poverty rate (~21.3%) and lower income (~$54,080).
Coolidge (15,300 people) has similarly affordable housing (~$203,100 median, rent ~$1,150/month) with income around $57,161 and a higher poverty rate of roughly 22.2% — the highest of the three Pinal entries.
Yuma County — 59.7% Republican
Yuma County sits in the far southwest corner of Arizona, bordering both California and Mexico. Yuma is one of the sunniest cities on earth and one of the most important agricultural regions in North America, which shapes both its economy and its demographics. Yuma County has the lowest injury-death proxy in this table (73.2 per 100,000).
23. Yuma
County: Yuma | Population: 98,461 | County GOP %: 59.7%
Yuma is the largest city on this list by population and the only one approaching 100,000 residents. It’s a major agricultural and military hub (Marine Corps Air Station Yuma) with a long-established Mexican-American community that gives it a cultural character distinct from the mountain and high-desert communities higher on the list.
Affordability: Median home value approximately $209,100, rent around $1,085/month, income roughly $62,546, poverty about 15.3% — reasonable affordability for a city of this size.
Safety (county proxy): Yuma County CHR: homicides 4.0, injury deaths 73.2 per 100,000 — the lowest injury-death proxy in this table.
Best fit for: Buyers who want a larger Arizona city with affordable housing, strong agricultural and military employment anchors, and a conservative county lean — while accepting that Yuma’s cultural character is significantly more diverse than the communities higher on this list.
24–25. San Luis and Somerton
Both are smaller Yuma County communities sharing the county’s safety proxy (homicides 4.0, injury deaths 73.2 per 100,000).
San Luis (35,998 people) is a border city directly adjacent to San Luis Río Colorado, Sonora, Mexico. It has very affordable housing (~$197,400 median, rent ~$746/month) and a higher poverty rate (~21.9%), reflecting its border-community economic profile. It is similar to Douglas in Cochise County in this respect.
Somerton (14,383 people) is a small agricultural community with affordable housing (~$206,100 median, rent ~$909/month), a relatively healthy poverty rate (~15.1%), and the strongest household income of the Yuma trio at approximately $71,825.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why isn’t Scottsdale or Mesa on this list?
Scottsdale and Mesa are in Maricopa County, which recorded a 52.8% Republican presidential vote share in 2024 — solidly competitive but well below the 60%+ threshold where counties appear in this table. On a county-proxy conservatism ranking, Maricopa County doesn’t make the cut. If you’re comparing individual city political climates, precinct-level or city voter registration data would give a more nuanced picture of Scottsdale specifically.
What does 77.6% Republican actually mean in daily life?
In Mohave County, roughly 77.6% of presidential votes cast in 2024 went to the Republican candidate. In practice, a county this politically uniform tends to have conservative-leaning local government, civic organisations, and dominant cultural norms — but it doesn’t guarantee anything about any specific neighbourhood, business, or person. It’s a population-level signal, not a street-level guarantee.
Is Prescott or Prescott Valley better?
They share the same county GOP score and similar populations (~46–48k). The key measurable difference is housing cost: Prescott’s median home (~$528,500) is roughly $152,000 more than Prescott Valley’s (~$376,300). Prescott offers a historic downtown and stronger name recognition. Prescott Valley offers newer suburban infrastructure at a lower entry price. Renters should note Prescott Valley’s rent (~$1,471/month) runs higher than Prescott’s (~$1,304/month).
Is Arizona a red or blue state overall?
Arizona has become a genuinely competitive swing state. In 2024, the Republican presidential candidate carried Arizona. But the state has elected Democratic senators and came close in multiple recent statewide races. The counties in this table — Mohave, Graham, Gila, Yavapai — are reliably conservative; the Phoenix metro (Maricopa County) is where statewide elections are decided.
Conclusion
The most conservative cities in Arizona — by county-level GOP presidential vote share in 2024 — are led by Lake Havasu City, Bullhead City, and Kingman in Mohave County (77.6% Republican), followed by Safford and Thatcher in Graham County (73.6%). Further down the list, the Prescott and Prescott Valley area in Yavapai County (66.5%) offers the most established conservative relocation infrastructure, with the highest name recognition and best-developed amenities for buyers making a permanent move.
The right choice depends heavily on what else you’re optimising for. If affordability is the priority, look at Bullhead City, Safford, or Globe. If you want a retirement-destination feel with proven infrastructure, Prescott is the benchmark — at a price. If you want Phoenix-area growth with a conservative lean, Maricopa (the city) has the income profile to match. And if Sedona came up in your search, read the county-proxy note carefully before drawing conclusions about its political character.
Data sources: Arizona 2024 General Election Official Canvass; U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 5-year estimates (population, housing, income); U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line place geography; County Health Rankings (CHR) county-level safety proxies.